Bergoglio and the “sound realism of the Catholic Church”

 

A)  The text of the speech by J.M.Bergoglio:

“Jesus knows us so well … and he knows how we are made because he is the creator, he knows our nature”. This is what he suggests: “If you have a problem with a brother — he uses the word ‘adversary’ — bring yourselves to an agreement”. In this way the Lord “also teaches us a healthy realism: many times you cannot achieve perfection, but at least you do what you can, you reach an agreement so as not to end up in court”. This is the “healthy realism of the Catholic Church: the Catholic Church never teaches “either this, or this”. Rather, “the Church says: “this and this”. In short, “strive for perfection: reconcile yourself with your brother, do not insult him, love him, but should you have any problem at least put yourself in agreement, so as to avoid war”. This is the “healthy realism of Catholicism”. Whereas, “it is not Catholic but heretical” to say: “either this or nothing”.

Jesus always knows … how to walk with us, he gives us the ideal, he accompanies us towards the ideal, he frees us from being locked into the rigidity of the law and he tells us: ‘Do this to the extent that you can’. And he understands us well”. This “is our Lord, it is he who teaches us”, saying: “Please, do not insult each other, do not be hypocrites. You go to praise God with the same language with which you insulted your brother. No, do not do that, but do what you can, at least avoid war amongst yourselves, agree with each other”. … Allow me to share a term with you which might seem a bit strange, it is the little holiness of negotiation: I cannot do everything, but I want to do everything, I am going to agree with you, at least let us not insult one another, let us not make war and let us live together in peace”.

“Jesus is great- …and he frees us from all of our miseries, even from that idealism that is not Catholic”. Therefore, “let us ask the Lord to teach us, first, to leave all rigidity, but to go upwards, to be able to adore and praise God; that He may teach us to be reconciled with one another; and also, that He may teach us to agree with each other to the extent that we can”. (Homily, Domus Sanctae Marthae, June 9th 2016)

 

B) References to Scriptures:

I am astonished that you are so promptly turning away from the one who called you in the grace of Christ and are going over to a different gospel -not that it is another gospel; except that there are trouble -makers among you who are seeking to pervert the gospel of Christ. But even if we ourselves or an angel from heaven preaches to you a gospel other than the one we preached to you, let God’s curse be on him. I repeat again what we declared before: anyone who preaches to you a gospel other than the one you were first given is to be under God’s curse. Whom am I trying to convince now, human beings or God? Am I trying to please human beings? If I were still doing that I should not be a servant of Christ.”  (Gal 1:6-10)

He was in the world that had come into being through him, and the world did not recognise him. He came to his own and his own people did not accept him. But to those who did accept him he gave power to become children of God, to those who believed in his name who were born not from human stock or human desire or human will but from God himself.” (Joh 1:10-13)

 

C) Comment:

Here’s the manifesto of Bergoglio’s new global pseudo religion. The manifesto of the “sound realism” of Bergoglio’s Catholic church, not Christ’s. What does “sound realism” mean? It means “negotiating”, even what should not be negotiated nor traded nor sold off. Just as what Bergoglio said: in theory we can say what the Gospel says … in theory, we all agree.

Bergoglio negotiates Christ and His true authentic doctrine, His immutable Law, to welcome and to collect the favor and the consensus of everything and everybody, to include everybody in his new global pseudo religion, in his new global religious philosophy, where Christ is no longer the Rock, the foundation.

Christ is sold-off, disappeared. And His salvific sacrifice forgotten.

“I agree with you: I renounce to Christ, stumbling Stone, so that we all live in peace”. Here in direct Bergoglio sells Christ off.

The children of Mary, Mother Church, New Jerusalem, in unison reply: “No!”. Christ will never be sold off or traded in exchange of a false peace. Peace will be stable and permanent on Earth only when everybody will accept Christ, Son of God, and thus will embrace only and exclusively the only true religion wanted by God the Father.

The children of Mary, New Jerusalem, are not afraid of fighting the holy war against those who want to sell off Christ and His authentic teachings for a false pseudo world religion that is not founded on Christ, the Stone, the Rock, but that is inspired by Sai Baba.

Bergoglio was the first to declare war to the children of Mary New Jerusalem. And Mary’s children accept the challenge, unmasking Bergoglio and his project of false world peace.

If Bergoglio really wanted peace with everybody, why does he declare war to the children of Mary New Jerusalem?

Because Bergoglio is afraid. Because Bergoglio knows that the children of Mary from this Church, Mother Church, will fight until the end to defend Christ and His true teachings; for the triumph of Mary’s Immaculate Heart; and to give honor and glory to God, the Almighty Father, forever and ever. Amen